UDL and Constructionism

There are many different theories and models related to education and the best ways to teach students. There are two terms that I recently learned more about: the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Constructionism. Constructionism is a theory by Seymour Papert that describes education through engaging lessons (Ackermann, E., 2001). Papert believed that the best way for learners to get the most out of education was to be motivated and interested in it. In order for students to be more motivated, lessons need to be hands-on, where students have the opportunity to create something. The Universal Design for Learning is another model which focuses on three things: engagement, representation, and action/expression. With this model, it is suggested that students be given more choices, have multiple ways to show what they know, and interact with others.

"UDL and Constructionism" by Emily Vailliencourt

While these are two different models, they have many similarities. The main similarity that stood out to me is the idea that students need to be motivated and understand why what they’re learning is important. They also both emphasize engagement. The UDL specifies “play” is important and constructionism focuses on creation, but both are about having lessons that are engaging and exciting, where students enjoy what they are doing. Overall, there are many similarities between the two, and both are beneficial to consider when designing lessons.

(2024). The UDL Guidelines. Cast. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget's Constructivism, Papert's Constructionism: What's the Difference?. Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 1-11, doi:10.1.1.132.4253